A man was going down from Jerusalem to Jericho and he fell among thieves.
As they were in the process of beating and robbing him, there came a Pharisee, who looked upon the scene. The Pharisee decided not to intervene, and to come back later when he could offer humanitarian aid, that is, if the man would be alive.
Next, a Levite came by on the same road. He was horrified by what he saw, and immediately set out to gather the council together and write a letter of protest to the Robbers' Guild, and to put out a press release.
Lastly, a Samaritan came by...
I wonder what the fate of the man who fell among thieves might have been, had someone stumbled across his situation. Tim has a post up entitled "Living the Disarmed Life", which challenges us to think about a Christian position of pacifism. Tim has some interesting things to say from time to time on this sort of thing. Not always exactly in agreement with my own sentiments, but thoughfully put forth nontheless, and worth engaging.
I do wonder, however, what a parable might be like had someone been in the position to prevent the man from being beaten in the first place, and failed to do it.
I'm just sayin', that's all.
Joe, I think that the questions you raise have to do with the difference between 'pacifism' and 'passive-ism'. They are frequently confused with one another, but I don't think they are the same thing.
I think John Yoder was right to phrase this issue in terms of love for one's enemies. Love can never be passive. Love always looks for ways to take the initiative. Love might even have been busy looking for creative ways of making the road from Jerusalem to Jericho a less dangerous route...
Posted by: Tim | June 11, 2006 at 11:34 PM
I like the distinction in the phrasing, Tim. One thing that a few of us have been chatting about is "what is appropriate intervention (by force if necessary)?", and thrown into the mix are a few who say that intervention by force is never appropriate.
Of course the question can have a small, local scope or an international scope.
Posted by: joseph | June 12, 2006 at 09:19 AM
Please don't misunderstand me, Joe. I'm not backing down from my basic Anabaptist nonviolence position! I'm 'just sayin' that I think that's not the end of the story. I think true love of enemies doesn't wait for the enemies to strike, but goes out to them with the love of God long before they strike.
I also think that the questions 'Should a secular state respond to violence with violence?' and 'Should followers of Jesus participate in war?' are two totally different questions. We only confuse them because of fifteen centuries of Christendom.
Posted by: Tim | June 12, 2006 at 02:06 PM
I hope I didn't misrepresent your position, Tim. I haven't really delved into this sort of question very much, so this is really just an opening volley into that whole area of thought and action. I'm intrigued by several figures in the gospels - the soldiers who come to John the Baptist, the "faithful" centurion.
I do see varying answers to the questions. When your two questions are collapsed into one, it could also be the case that Christians are part of a secular state, and engage in militaristic actions.
Prevention is always best, but when prevention fails... how does a Christian respond? I am intrigued not just because of the "theory" side of it, but also because I served in a parish with a good number of military folks. I think I'll just let this one stew for a while...
Posted by: joseph | June 12, 2006 at 06:32 PM
Fair enough. I recognise that faithful Christians disagree on this one (and I've moved on it, too!).
Posted by: Tim | June 12, 2006 at 06:47 PM
This would be a great topic for sol cafe to work thru as well, I personally come from a mennonite family that has questioned pacifism directly, and made some definite choices. So this would be worth talking and praying thru, I believe.
Posted by: steve the z | June 16, 2006 at 12:02 PM
Hi,
I am a musician who has been impacted by Keith Green and I would be honored if you would check out my music, all music is free to download. I just wanted to share my music with People who love Jesus. www.SeanDietrich.com
I don't want to be a pest, so if this really annoys you, please delete it and accept my humble apology.
Thanks so much,
-Sean
____________________
www.SeanDietrich.com
"All my music is free."
Posted by: sean | July 09, 2006 at 12:03 AM